Flight Only / Airline and Airports

Discussions relating to flight only, airlines and airports.
Reply
The biggest problem is route networks and convenience. Charter airlines, which are often a subsidiary of a tour operator, for example Thomson Airways (Thomson / First Choice), Thomas Cook Airlines (Thomas Cook Group) and Monarch Airlines (Monarch), work on the basis they are chartered to operate flights for a tour operator to a particular destination. Using scheduled airlines is fine if you're travelling to parts of mainland europe, the middle east or America from major international airports like Heathrow, Gatwick and Manchester. However, try and find a non-stop airline to many of the Caribbean Islands such as the Dominican Republic, Cuba, Jamaica, or the Greek Islands, Canaries, Egypt and Turkey from regional airports. The problem with schedule airlines is they operate from hubs that are often inconvienient for charter (holiday) needs, or you need to connect through other hubs on route networks. It wouldn't work for the general holiday market. If it wasn't for charter airlines for example at Manchester, you'd have to route via an American hub to get to say Punta Cana. This is likely to be more expensive and an extra 4 or 5 hours of travelling, plus the hassle of connecting. Try the Greek Islands, would you prefer a non-stop service to Rhodes or the hassle of flying in to Athens then connecting? Many 'bucket and spade' destinations aren't served by scheduled carriers with sufficient capacity. I can't see the charter airlines dissapearing anytime soon as they are a key requirement serving the holiday market.

Darren
Reply
Its an interesting discussion.

In my opinion there are less charter operators around these days than in the past. Over the years they have amalgamated as has tour operators and now only a few have the market.

I also think that many tour companies who operate across to North America as an example do use the scheduled carriers more and more - often trying to soften the "blow" by including reduced or free domestic flights from the regions to London/Manchester to catch the long haul.

Further, I also think that tour companies already utilise low cost airlines like EasyJet, Monarch (scheduled - ZB) as part of their "holiday package" flight.

It was also interesting in the days of FlyGlobespan - their aircraft were utilised by holidy packages booked through Globespan Holidays and others mixed with seat only tickets bought by the passenger on the airlines website.

While many of the bucket and spade destinations are not served by scheduled ops airlines (so called full service ones) a surprising amount are and they are also supplemented of course by the LCO.

So it is interesting and charter airlines/tour operators appear not to sell all their capacity for the fully inclusive traveller and seats are often sold separately, subject to any rules or restrictions they may have imposed on them doing so.

Nivsy
Reply
It wouldn't work for the general holiday market. If it wasn't for charter airlines for example at Manchester, you'd have to route via an American hub to get to say Punta Cana. This is likely to be more expensive and an extra 4 or 5 hours of travelling, plus the hassle of connecting


While I understand Darrens points - as someone who lives up in the far frozen north of Britain, I do have to take issue with comments about ease of reaching destinations via charter.

Lots of "bucket and spade" destinations are actually not provided for by charter flights from northern airports, or are done so with very limited flights and often outrageous add-on flight premiums.
Just try booking a Thomson flight out of Edinburgh sometime and watch your eyes bleed!

And lots of folk up north wanting to go to places like Croatia, or Sicily or Luxor, or Agadir or...
- are forced to drive for many hours to Manchester, OR we have to fly Easyjet or whatever to get a connection onto a charter flight at Gatwick.

I normally go to Sri Lanka each year - and thanks to Emirates I can fly out of Glasgow or Newcastle. Yes - there's a hub at Dubai I have to change at - but that's no worse (and actually better) than trying to do a change at Gatwick since I can book my luggage all the way to final destination.
I can do the same thing to Thailand, and I'm going to try something similar for Goa next year, rather than use charter.

I agree charter airlines will not vanish tomorrow.
But I do think we might be entering a new phase of holiday travel.
Nivsy is right - some smaller tour operators are already selling holidays which include Easyjet flights.
And the big operators often plan long haul already on major carriers rather than their own airlines.

Tour Operators are excellent at planning and scheduling and collecting together the pieces which make a holiday.
But they don't necessarily OWN the hotels they use, nor need they own the airlines.
Fast, flexible, planning and buying forward, might allow them greater profits while providing actually providing customers a more comprehensive choice.
Reply
I'm sure there's room in the market for both types of operators.

Darren
Reply
Holiday Truths Forum

Post a Reply

Please sign in or register an account to reply to this post.

Sign in / Register

Holiday Truths Forum Ship image

Get the best deals!

from our cruise, ski and holiday partners

You can change your email preferences at any time.

Yes, I want to save money by receiving personalised travel emails with awesome deals from Holiday Truths group companies which are hotholidays.co.uk,getrcuising.co.uk and getskiing.co.uk. By subscribing I agree to the Privacy Policy

No, thank you.