or phoning roz, the solicitor who is very good with things like this, and you can get telephone advice...
i have no idea wether you WILL get a full refund on the leg room seats, but personally i think you should do....
just check out your standing first to see wether it is worth carrying on the fight.
I can't see why FC won't up the refund from £50 to £75, especially as you are happy to accept that your wife had an extra legroom seat on one sector.
Hope you get this sorted - I would be looking for a refund too in your shoes
Row 12 ( 2 seats )is an exit row where the extra leg room seats are. Row 13 also by the emergency exit you are right in saying it is only the window seat that has the extra legroom as there is no seat in front. This seat would be classed as extra legroom. If your wife had thew window seat both ways then she did have the extra legroom both ways. I assume this is why they will only refund the cost for you not getting the extra legroom. I am assumming by your post that was £25.00 each way for each seat. Your wife had the extra legroom hence that cost £50.00 you didnt so therefore a refund of £50.00.
Hope I have read the post correctly, if your wife didnt get the window seat on the return and the extra legroom then i can then see why you are looking for a £75 refund.
Not sure why the cabin crew would say the emergency exits are not the extra leg room seats as in standard charter configuration they are the only extra legroom seats. Row 13 is not however other than the window seat. I would often book this row when travelling with the children as they can not sit in the emergency exit row but could sit in this row and I would get the extra legroom.
From what I saw on the plane the only seats which you had extra leg room was row 1
Flying out we were in 13e middle 13F window
Returning we were in 12B and 12C
Row 13 A and F are the only extra legroom seats apart from Row 1 so you did not get extra legroom on your return so I agree that you should be refunded £75.00 Maybe ask the person at First Choice to check your seat numbers with Thomsonfly so they can confirm those seats have no extra legroom. Only reason I can see for not refunding anymore is if any element of that cost is for "sitting together " and not extra legroom.
But as i explained to the girl at First Choice if they offered me £ 75.00 I was quiet happy but she wouldnt budge and was adamant we had sat in the extra leg room seats. I dont know if i mentioned before but i sent them copies of our boarding passes with the seat numbers on .
Thats why you have probably only been offered £25 as they are refunding your money as you werent in a leg room seat on the outward journey,but were on the way back.
Row 1 are classed as medical seats and cant be pre booked.
Sometimes they are allocated at check in if they are not required by anyone with with medical needs.
There is usually a seating plan in the booklet that your tickets arrive in.
I wish Thomson would use the 737-800 series on all short haul routes as all the seats have plenty of legroom!
Again they have said they will give me the refund for row 13 on outbound but not row 12 on the inbound
So £25.00 for not getting the extra leg room and £ 25.00 as a good will gesture
I still cant see the difference between rows 12 & 13
I did forward all my correspondence to Trading Standards and they have emailed me a template of a letter to send to First Choice Company Secretary quoting regs etc and to send it by recorded delivery.
I can see why people do give up after 2 letters as it is like banging your head against a brickwall
Perhaps I am being petty hanging out for a refund of £ 75.00 but i am really annoyed with their customer services attitude .
Does this happen often? Some people only book a holiday knowing they'll pre book the extra leg room, so to then not get it seems very wrong to me! It's kind of like hiring a limo and a taxi turning up!!!
It may only be a small overcharge, but if you multiply it by the potential overcharge they could possibly make day after day on something like this then it could be big money.
It also sounds like they don't really uinderstand the 'product' they are selling ie the extra leg room seats, where they are located on specific aircraft etc
It can't be the first time they have had to change the supply of aircraft on a given flight, surely they should have all the details to hand and be able to give you an explanation that satisfys you that you have been treated fairly.
I have been a Thomson customer for many years, this is the first time I have ever complained and I am disgusted by their after service.
Perhaps we all ought to contact watchdog or similar?
not once did we ever get what we paid for.......always got standard letters for replys, and basically ignored.........
i think its good that you are pushing for what you believe is right
It seems like Thomson are giving a refund for one journey only which is what the OP is claiming for.
Post a Reply
Please sign in or register an account to reply to this post.